Acidtech wrote:
An RS-232 circuit is a MAX232(or equivilent) chip along with associated parts with a DB-9 connector. The data sheets shows how to wire up a RS-232 connector to the a Nano processor. Sorry if that confused you. If you attached the RS-232 pins directly to a Nano you probably fried it(though I did the same thing today and it didn't kill the chip I was working with so I'd double check it before anything else).
RS-232 refers to the protocol or "standard" the Com port uses. DB-9 is just the connector it uses, RS-232 is the protocol which utilizes the +/- 12v voltages.
Max232 is just an RS232 converter, it's not a "rs-232 circuit."
RS-232 and DB-9 are so well associated with eachother, that the DB-9 port, can actually be called a RS-232 port.
Simply googling (
rs-232 port) will give you a butt load of DB9/ PC com port related information. But little if nothing related to TTL.
It might just be a misunderstanding, or a the usage of the terms change over time and get mixed up.
From my understanding, RS-232, always referred to the com port level signals of a PC.
So when the datasheet shows how to connect up RS-232, i assumed it meant directly to the RS-232 port. And i'm not the only one to make that assumption.
The assumption stems from the lack of clarification. Unless it says it needs an RS-232 to TTL converter, we are only left open to guess based off the information provided, which says to use the RS-232 lines, IE directly from the PC's com port.
So RS-232 circuit does not quite count as RS-232 to TTL converter.
And you're right, using it directly doesn't seem to have any long lasting ill effects. I used standard serial at first too, and because the studio didn't detect the atom, it didn't send any additional signals so the nano remained, to my knowledge, undamaged.
It seems to be working fine at least.
So, 5-10 minutes to amend the datasheet and any manuals, and we shouldn't see this problem again.
I'd do it myself if i could. Except i'd probably get to wordy and extend the manual 5 pages.